GAAP v/s IFRS
GAAP (US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) is the
accounting standard used in the US, while IFRS (International
Financial Reporting Standards) is the accounting standard used in over 110
countries around the world. GAAP is considered a more “rules based” system of
accounting, while IFRS is more “principles based.” The U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission is looking to switch to IFRS by 2015.
What follows is an overview of the differences between the
accounting frameworks used by GAAP and IFRS. This is at a broad, framework
level; differences in accounting treatments for individual cases may also be added
as this gets updated.
Comparison chart
GAAP
|
IFRS
|
|
Stands
for:
|
Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles
|
International Financial Reporting
Standards
|
Introduction
(from Wikipedia):
|
Generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) refer to the standard framework of
guidelines for financial accounting used in any given jurisdiction;
generally known as accounting standards or standard accounting practice.
|
International Financial Reporting
Standards are designed as a common global language for business affairs
so that company accounts are understandable and comparable across international
boundaries.
|
Used
in:
|
United
States
|
Over
110 countries, including those in the European Union
|
Performance
elements:
|
Revenue
or expenses, assets or liabilities, gains, losses, comprehensive income
|
Revenue
or expenses, assets or liabilities
|
Required
documents in financial statements:
|
Balance
sheet, income statement, statement of comprehensive income, changes in
equity, cash flow statement, footnotes
|
Balance
sheet, income statement, changes in equity, cash flow statement, footnotes
|
Inventory
Estimates:
|
Only
first-in, first-out
|
|
Inventory
Reversal:
|
Prohibited
|
Permitted
under certain criteria
|
Purpose
of the framework:
|
US
GAAP (or FASB) framework has no provision that expressly requires management
to consider the framework in the absence of a standard or interpretation for
an issue.
|
Under
IFRS, company management is expressly required to consider the framework if
there is no standard or interpretation for an issue.
|
Objectives
Of financial statements:
|
In
general, broad focus to provide relevant info to a wide range of
stakeholders. GAAP provides separate objectives for business and
non-business entities.
|
In
general, broad focus to provide relevant info to a wide range of
stakeholders. IFRS provides the same set of objectives for business and
non-business entities.
|
Underlying
assumptions:
|
The
"going concern" assumption is not well-developed in the US GAAP
framework.
|
IFRS
gives prominence to underlying assumptions such as accrual and going concern.
|
Qualitative
characteristics:
|
Relevance,
reliability, comparability and understand ability GAAP establishes a
hierarchy of these characteristics. Relevance and reliability are primary
qualities. Comparability is secondary. Understand ability is treated as a
user-specific quality.
|
Relevance,
reliability, comparability and understand ability The IASB framework (IFRS)
states that its decision cannot be based upon specific circumstances of
individual users.
|
Definition
of an asset:
|
The
US GAAP framework defines an asset as a future economic benefit.
|
The
IFRS framework defines an asset as a resource from which future economic
benefit will flow to the company.
|